Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Tomeng
dc.contributor.authorJantz, Bastianeng
dc.contributor.authorLægreid, Pereng
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-12T13:44:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-10T06:32:21Z
dc.date.available2015-02-12T13:44:48Z
dc.date.available2020-12-10T06:32:21Z
dc.date.issued2014-11eng
dc.identifier.issn1503-0946
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/9391
dc.description.abstractThis paper starts with a theoretical discussion on the relationship between performance and accountability in public organizations with a special focus on administrative reforms. Accountability theory is discussed and related to different aspects of performance. How ambiguous is the relationship between accountability and performance? Do different types of accountability relate to different aspects of performance or pose certain challenges in NPM reforms, post‐NPM reforms and hybrid reforms? The second part of the paper illustrates accountability and performance relations in two large welfare administration reforms in Norway (NAV‐reform) and Germany (Hartz‐reform) by addressing the impact of these reforms on accountability and performance dynamics. We focus on how the reforms have affected different kinds of accountability relations and the relationship between accountability and performance by focusing on performance management systems. The data used are document studies, interviews and survey data from a large evaluation project.en_US
dc.publisherStein Rokkan Centre for Social Studieseng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper 09-2014en_US
dc.titleAccountability and performance in welfare administration reform. Comparing Norway and Germanyeng
dc.typeWorking papereng
dc.rights.holderCopyright Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies. All rights reserved.
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200nob


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record