Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVickers, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorMalnes, Eirik
dc.contributor.authorVan Pelt, Ward
dc.contributor.authorPohjola, Veijo
dc.contributor.authorKillie, Mari Anne
dc.contributor.authorSaloranta, Tuomo
dc.contributor.authorKarlsen, Stein Rune
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-03T13:07:22Z
dc.date.available2024-07-03T13:07:22Z
dc.date.created2021-06-18T12:07:26Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing. 2021, 13:2002 (10), 1-23.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3137721
dc.description.abstractReliable and accurate mapping of snow cover are essential in applications such as water resource management, hazard forecasting, calibration and validation of hydrological models and climate impact assessments. Optical remote sensing has been utilized as a tool for snow cover monitoring over the last several decades. However, consistent long-term monitoring of snow cover can be challenging due to differences in spatial resolution and retrieval algorithms of the different generations of satellite-based sensors. Snow models represent a complementary tool to remote sensing for snow cover monitoring, being able to fill in temporal and spatial data gaps where a lack of observations exist. This study utilized three optical remote sensing datasets and two snow models with overlapping periods of data coverage to investigate the similarities and discrepancies in snow cover estimates over Nordenskiöld Land in central Svalbard. High-resolution Sentinel-2 observations were utilized to calibrate a 20-year MODIS snow cover dataset that was subsequently used to correct snow cover fraction estimates made by the lower resolution AVHRR instrument and snow model datasets. A consistent overestimation of snow cover fraction by the lower resolution datasets was found, as well as estimates of the first snow-free day (FSFD) that were, on average, 10–15 days later when compared with the baseline MODIS estimates. Correction of the AVHRR time series produced a significantly slower decadal change in the land-averaged FSFD, indicating that caution should be exercised when interpreting climate-related trends from earlier lower resolution observations. Substantial differences in the dynamic characteristics of snow cover in early autumn were also present between the remote sensing and snow model datasets, which need to be investigated separately. This work demonstrates that the consistency of earlier low spatial resolution snow cover datasets can be improved by using current-day higher resolution datasets.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA compilation of snow cover datasets for svalbard: A multi-sensor, multi-model studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeA compilation of snow cover datasets for svalbard: A multi-sensor, multi-model studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 by the authorsen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs13102002
dc.identifier.cristin1916733
dc.source.journalRemote Sensingen_US
dc.source.volume13:2002en_US
dc.source.issue10en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-23en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 269927en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal