Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRickels, Wilfried
dc.contributor.authorSchwinger, Jörg
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-03T09:33:04Z
dc.date.available2024-07-03T09:33:04Z
dc.date.created2021-09-27T16:28:55Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Research Letters. 2021, 16 (10), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1748-9326
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3137666
dc.description.abstractAssessing climate policies that involve temporary overshoot of temperature targets requires an accurate representation of carbon cycle and climate dynamics. Here, we compare temperature overshoot climate policies obtained with the dynamic integrated climate–economy (DICE) integrated assessment model using two different climate-carbon cycle sub-models: first, the original DICE implementation, and second an implementation of the finite amplitude impulse response (FaIR) simple climate model. We analyze in a cost-effectiveness framework the minimum abatement and carbon dioxide removal costs for compliance against a (future) ceiling on temperatures. In our setup, the magnitude of the overshoot is not limited by temperature impacts, but simply by the temperature dynamics such that from a certain compliance date onwards a temperature ceiling cannot be exceeded anymore. We show that the rather sluggish temperature response and underestimation of carbon sinks in the most recent version of DICE implies that the additional future temperature change after a cessation of a given CO2 emission scenario is significantly overestimated compared to the zero emission commitments obtained with FaIR and complex earth system models. However, investigating climate policies which allow for a temporary temperature overshoot, this inertia translates into more than twice as high optimal carbon prices compared to FaIR and consequently in rather strict climate policies. For compliance with the 1.5 °C target from 2100 onward and non-CO2-warming of 0.2 °C, the mean optimal carbon prices in the year 2030 are 173USD/tCO2 and 56USD/tCO2 for DICE and FaIR, respectively. Still, the dynamics towards the target suggest that improved understanding of and accounting for (limited) reversibility of vulnerable Earth system components is required to derive appropriate overshoot climate policies.en_US
dc.description.abstractImplications of temperature overshoot dynamics for climate and carbon dioxide removal policies in the DICE modelen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleImplications of temperature overshoot dynamics for climate and carbon dioxide removal policies in the DICE modelen_US
dc.title.alternativeImplications of temperature overshoot dynamics for climate and carbon dioxide removal policies in the DICE modelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1748-9326/ac22c0
dc.identifier.cristin1939244
dc.source.journalEnvironmental Research Lettersen_US
dc.source.volume16en_US
dc.source.issue10en_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 294930en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Økonomi: 210en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Economics: 210en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Økonomi: 210en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Economics: 210en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal