Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPawlowski, Jan
dc.contributor.authorBruce, Kat
dc.contributor.authorPanksep, Kristel
dc.contributor.authorAguirre, F.I
dc.contributor.authorAmalfitano, S.
dc.contributor.authorApothéloz-Perret-Gentil, Laure
dc.contributor.authorBaussant, Thierry
dc.contributor.authorBouchez, Agnès
dc.contributor.authorCarugati, L.
dc.contributor.authorCermakova, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorCordier, Tristan
dc.contributor.authorCorinaldesi, C.
dc.contributor.authorCosta, F.O
dc.contributor.authorDanovaro, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorDell’Anno, A.
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, S.
dc.contributor.authorEisendle, U.
dc.contributor.authorFerrari, B.J.D
dc.contributor.authorFrontalini, Fabrizio
dc.contributor.authorFrühe, Larissa
dc.contributor.authorHaegerbaeumer, A.
dc.contributor.authorKisand, V.
dc.contributor.authorKrolicka, Adriana
dc.contributor.authorLanzén, Anders
dc.contributor.authorLeese, Florian
dc.contributor.authorLejzerowicz, Franck
dc.contributor.authorLyautey, E.
dc.contributor.authorMaček, I.
dc.contributor.authorSagova-Marečková, Marketa
dc.contributor.authorPearman, John K.
dc.contributor.authorPochon, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorStoeck, Thorsten
dc.contributor.authorVivien, Régis
dc.contributor.authorWeigand, A.
dc.contributor.authorFazi, Stefano
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-11T06:57:22Z
dc.date.available2024-06-11T06:57:22Z
dc.date.created2022-02-09T17:06:57Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3133422
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding (parallel sequencing of DNA/RNA for identification of whole communities within a targeted group) is revolutionizing the field of aquatic biomonitoring. To date, most metabarcoding studies aiming to assess the ecological status of aquatic ecosystems have focused on water eDNA and macroinvertebrate bulk samples. However, the eDNA metabarcoding has also been applied to soft sediment samples, mainly for assessing microbial or meiofaunal biota. Compared to classical methodologies based on manual sorting and morphological identification of benthic taxa, eDNA metabarcoding offers potentially important advantages for assessing the environmental quality of sediments. The methods and protocols utilized for sediment eDNA metabarcoding can vary considerably among studies, and standardization efforts are needed to improve their robustness, comparability and use within regulatory frameworks. Here, we review the available information on eDNA metabarcoding applied to sediment samples, with a focus on sampling, preservation, and DNA extraction steps. We discuss challenges specific to sediment eDNA analysis, including the variety of different sources and states of eDNA and its persistence in the sediment. This paper aims to identify good-practice strategies and facilitate method harmonization for routine use of sediment eDNA in future benthic monitoring.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleEnvironmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methodsen_US
dc.title.alternativeEnvironmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methodsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 by the authorsen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151783
dc.identifier.cristin1999677
dc.source.journalScience of the Total Environmenten_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal