Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKarypidou, Maria Chara
dc.contributor.authorSobolowski, Stefan Pieter
dc.contributor.authorSangelantoni, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorNikulin, Grigory
dc.contributor.authorKatragkou, Eleni
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-20T08:41:49Z
dc.date.available2023-09-20T08:41:49Z
dc.date.created2023-06-14T13:37:46Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationGeoscientific Model Development. 2023, 16 (7), 1887-1908.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1991-959X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3090706
dc.description.abstractThe region of southern Africa (SAF) is among the most exposed climate change hotspots and is projected to experience severe impacts across multiple economical and societal sectors. For this reason, producing reliable projections of the expected impacts of climate change is key for local communities. In this work we use an ensemble of 19 regional climate model (RCM) simulations performed in the context of the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) – Africa and a set of 10 global climate models (GCMs) participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) that were used as the driving GCMs in the RCM simulations. We are concerned about the degree to which RCM simulations are influenced by their driving GCMs, with regards to monthly precipitation climatologies, precipitation biases and precipitation change signal, according to the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 for the end of the 21st century. We investigate the degree to which RCMs and GCMs are able to reproduce specific climatic features over SAF and over three sub-regions, namely the greater Angola region, the greater Mozambique region, and the greater South Africa region. We identify that during the beginning of the rainy season, when regional processes are largely dependent on the coupling between the surface and the atmosphere, the impact of the driving GCMs on the RCMs is smaller compared to the core of the rainy season, when precipitation is mainly controlled by the large-scale circulation. In addition, we show that RCMs are able to counteract the bias received by their driving GCMs; hence, we claim that the cascade of uncertainty over SAF is not additive, but indeed the RCMs do provide improved precipitation climatologies. The fact that certain bias patterns during the historical period (1985–2005) identified in GCMs are resolved in RCMs provides evidence that RCMs are reliable tools for climate change impact studies over SAF.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe impact of lateral boundary forcing in the CORDEX-Africa ensemble over southern Africaen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe impact of lateral boundary forcing in the CORDEX-Africa ensemble over southern Africaen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) 2023en_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/gmd-16-1887-2023
dc.identifier.cristin2154493
dc.source.journalGeoscientific Model Developmenten_US
dc.source.volume16en_US
dc.source.issue7en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1887-1908en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal