Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorChalub Cruz, William
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Xiaodong
dc.contributor.authorPetvipusit, Kurt Rachares
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-03T13:14:47Z
dc.date.available2022-10-03T13:14:47Z
dc.date.created2022-09-30T10:30:34Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationEnergies. 2022, 15 (17), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3023401
dc.description.abstractThis work presents an ensemble-based workflow to simultaneously assimilate multiple types of field data in a proper and consistent manner. The aim of using multiple field datasets is to improve the reliability of estimated reservoir models and avoid the underestimation of uncertainties. The proposed framework is based on an integrated history matching workflow, in which reservoir models are conditioned simultaneously on production, tracer and 4D seismic data with the help of three advanced techniques: adaptive localization (for better uncertainty quantification), weight adjustment (for balancing the influence of different types of field data), and sparse data representation (for handling big datasets). The integrated workflow is successfully implemented and tested in a 3D benchmark case with a set of comparison studies (with and without tracer data). The findings of this study indicate that joint history matching using production, tracer and 4D seismic data results in better estimated reservoir models and improved forecast performance. Moreover, the integrated workflow is flexible, and can be extended to incorporate more types of field data for further performance improvement. As such, the findings of this study can help to achieve a better understanding of the impacts of multiple datasets on history matching performance, and the proposed integrated workflow could serve as a useful tool for real field case studies in general.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleJoint History Matching of Multiple Types of Field Data in a 3D Field-Scale Case Studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeJoint History Matching of Multiple Types of Field Data in a 3D Field-Scale Case Studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 by the authorsen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en15176372
dc.identifier.cristin2057071
dc.source.journalEnergiesen_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.issue17en_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal