Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNeby, Simon
dc.contributor.authorZannakis, Mathias
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-04T11:53:21Z
dc.date.available2021-02-04T11:53:21Z
dc.date.created2021-01-26T11:15:57Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis. 2020, 22 (6), 593-611.
dc.identifier.issn1387-6988
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2726147
dc.description.abstractThrough the lenses of “wicked policy problems” this article compares how Norway and Sweden organize for climate policies and analyzes the coordination challenges encountered by the two countries. Both countries’ policy fields display characteristics of complexity, divergence, fragmentation and uncertainty, indicating a substantial degree of organizational wickedness. The conditions for dealing with such wickedness is affected by contextual factors such as ministerial rule and the petroleum industry’s pivotal role in Norway, enhancing the role of administrative silos; and Swedish traditions to delegate responsibility in the governance system and prohibition of ministerial rule allows a slightly more unified approach to policies.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleCoordinating wickedness: a comparative analysis of how Norway and Sweden organize for climate policies
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.rights.holder© 2020, Authors
dc.description.versionacceptedVersion
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1821362
dc.identifier.cristin1879439
dc.source.journalJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis
dc.source.volume22
dc.source.issue6
dc.source.pagenumber593-611


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som CC BY-NC-ND 4.0