Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMikkelsen, Aslaug
dc.contributor.authorEngen, Ole Andreas
dc.contributor.authorSteineke, J.M.
dc.contributor.authorJøsendal, Kari
dc.contributor.authorGrønhaug, K.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-26T13:25:03Z
dc.date.available2020-08-26T13:25:03Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.isbn82-490-0400-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2675170
dc.description.abstractApplying a social constructivist approach, this paper examines the extent to which critical events in the oil and gas industry influence knowledge and knowledge transfer of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Public archive data and semi-structured interviews with key informants in the companies as well as with outside actors were applied to trace the critical events, influencing actors and consequences. Our findings reveal that types of events and influencing actors changed over the years, as has the content of CSR. Social dialogues and partnerships became tools for knowledge creation and new perspectives on “secondary” risk management as much as for tools to improve the environmental and social impact of the companies’ activities. An implication of this situation seems to be that CSR is seen as a secondary risk assignment and as a competitive advantage with a knowledge spillover risk to other companies.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNorges Forskningsråden_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRogalandsforskningen_US
dc.titleConsequences of critical events for the social contruction of corporate social responsibilityen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe case of oil and gas companies in Norwayen_US
dc.typeResearch reporten_US
dc.source.pagenumber51en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel