Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSveinsdottir, Vigdis
dc.contributor.authorLie, Stein Atle
dc.contributor.authorBond, Gary R.
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Hege Randi
dc.contributor.authorTveito, Torill Helene
dc.contributor.authorGrasdal, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorReme, Silje Endresen
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-29T11:16:58Z
dc.date.available2020-04-29T11:16:58Z
dc.date.created2019-10-25T10:38:31Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2019, 46 (1), 50-59.
dc.identifier.issn0355-3140
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2652918
dc.description.abstractObjectives Individual placement and support (IPS) is an effective approach for helping people with severe mental illness gain employment. This study aimed to investigate if IPS can be effectively repurposed to support young adults at risk of early work disability due to various social and health related problems. Methods A randomized controlled trial including 96 young adults (18‒29 years; 68% men) was conducted in Norway. Participants were not in employment, education, or training, received temporary benefits due to social or health-related problems, and were eligible for traditional vocational rehabilitation (TVR). Participants were randomized to IPS (N=50) or TVR (N=46). Self-reported data were collected at baseline and at 6- and 12-months follow-up. The primary outcome was obtaining any paid employment in the competitive labor market during follow-up. Secondary outcomes were physical and mental health, well-being, coping, alcohol consumption, and drug use. Results Significantly more IPS participants obtained competitive employment compared to TVR participants during 12-months follow-up (48% versus 8%; odds ratio 10.39, 95% confidence interval 2.79‒38.68). The IPS group reported significantly better outcomes than the TVR group in subjective health complaints, helplessness, and hopelessness. In post hoc analyses adjusted for baseline and missing data, the IPS group reported significantly better outcomes on these measures in addition to level of disability, optimism about future well-being, and drug use. Conclusions IPS is effective for young adults at risk of early work disability. IPS was superior to TVR in increasing competitive employment and promoted improvements in some non-vocational outcomes. IPS services should be offered to improve employment rates in this vulnerable group.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleIndividual placement and support for young adults at risk of early work disability (the SEED trial). A randomized controlled trial
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.5271/sjweh.3837
dc.identifier.cristin1740517
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health
dc.source.volume46
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.pagenumber50-59


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

CC BY 4.0
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som CC BY 4.0