Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBaltaxe, Erik
dc.contributor.authorCzypionka, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorKraus, Markus
dc.contributor.authorReiss, Miriam
dc.contributor.authorAskildsen, Jan Erik
dc.contributor.authorGrenkovic, Renata
dc.contributor.authorLindén, Tord Skogedal
dc.contributor.authorPitter, János György
dc.contributor.authorRutten-van Molken, Maureen
dc.contributor.authorSolans, Oscar
dc.contributor.authorStokes, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorStruckmann, Verena
dc.contributor.authorRoca, Josep
dc.contributor.authorCano, Isaac
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T10:40:20Z
dc.date.available2020-04-01T10:40:20Z
dc.date.created2020-02-05T11:06:23Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1438-8871
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2649856
dc.description.abstractBackground: Digital health tools comprise a wide range of technologies to support health processes. The potential of these technologies to effectively support health care transformation is widely accepted. However, wide scale implementation is uneven among countries and regions. Identification of common factors facilitating and hampering the implementation process may be useful for future policy recommendations. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the implementation of digital health tools to support health care and social care services, as well as to facilitate the longitudinal assessment of these services, in 17 selected integrated chronic care (ICC) programs from 8 European countries. Methods: A program analysis based on thick descriptions—including document examinations and semistructured interviews with relevant stakeholders—of ICC programs in Austria, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and the United Kingdom was performed. A total of 233 stakeholders (ie, professionals, providers, patients, carers, and policymakers) were interviewed from November 2014 to September 2016. The overarching analysis focused on the use of digital health tools and program assessment strategies. Results: Supporting digital health tools are implemented in all countries, but different levels of maturity were observed among the programs. Only few ICC programs have well-established strategies for a comprehensive longitudinal assessment. There is a strong relationship between maturity of digital health and proper evaluation strategies of integrated care. Conclusions: Notwithstanding the heterogeneity of the results across countries, most programs aim to evolve toward a digital transformation of integrated care, including implementation of comprehensive assessment strategies. It is widely accepted that the evolution of digital health tools alongside clear policies toward their adoption will facilitate regional uptake and scale-up of services with embedded digital health tools.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleDigital Health Transformation of Integrated Care in Europe: Overarching Analysis of 17 Integrated Care Programs
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 The Authors
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/14956
dc.identifier.cristin1791046
dc.source.journalJournal of Medical Internet Research
dc.source.volume21
dc.source.issue9


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

CC BY 4.0
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som CC BY 4.0