Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Tom
dc.contributor.authorLægreid, Ole Martin
dc.contributor.authorLægreid, Per
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-30T13:40:32Z
dc.date.available2020-03-30T13:40:32Z
dc.date.created2019-06-29T09:34:54Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationPolicy & Society: Journal of public, foreign and global policy. 2019, 1-18.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1449-4035
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2649445
dc.description.abstractBased on a survey of civil servants in the Norwegian central government, this article describes perceptions of coordination capacity and examines to what degree the variations in perceived coordinating capacity can be explained by structural and cultural features. In particular, it focuses on the significance of wicked policy areas. Overall the coordination capacity is weaker in wicked policy areas than in other policy areas. Controlling for other features the coordination capacity is primarily related to cultural factors, such as mutual trust, level of conflict, and identification with the central government. Some structural features, such as administrative level, also have an effect.
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsCC BY-NC 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titleAdministrative coordination capacity; does the wickedness of policy areas matter?en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14494035.2019.1584147
dc.identifier.cristin1708783
dc.source.journalPolicy & Society: Journal of public, foreign and global policyen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-18en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

CC BY-NC 4.0
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som CC BY-NC 4.0