Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKristoffersen, Agnete Egilsdatter
dc.contributor.authorMusial, Frauke
dc.contributor.authorHamre, Harald Johan
dc.contributor.authorBjörkman, Lars
dc.contributor.authorStub, Trine
dc.contributor.authorSalamonsen, Anita
dc.contributor.authorAlræk, Terje
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-01T10:31:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-10T06:27:32Z
dc.date.available2016-04-01T10:31:59Z
dc.date.available2020-12-10T06:27:32Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-22
dc.identifier.citationBMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2016, 16(1)(22)eng
dc.identifier.issn1472-6882
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/11811
dc.description.abstractBackground. The dental filling material amalgam is generally well tolerated. However, a small proportion of dental patients experience health complaints which they attribute to amalgam. The symptom pattern is often similar to patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) and the health complaints may persist after amalgam removal. Among patients with MUPS, the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) seems to be high. The aim of this survey was to describe the prevalence and range of CAM use among people with health complaints attributed to dental amalgam fillings in which the health problems persist after the removal of all amalgam fillings. Specific attention was paid to (1) self-reported effects of CAM, (2) differences in CAM use dependent on self-reported health, and (3) gender differences in self-reported CAM use. Methods. A survey was distributed to all members of The Norwegian dental patient association (NDPA) (n = 999), the response rate was 36.4 %. The anonymous questionnaire asked for socio-demographic data, health complaints related to former amalgam fillings, subjectively perceived health status, symptoms, and experience with therapeutic interventions, mostly from the spectrum of CAM. Only participants who had all their fillings removed, which was the vast majority, were analysed. Results. A total of 88.9 % of included respondents had used at least one CAM modality, with a higher proportion of men (95.7 %) compared to women (86.2 %, p = 0.015). The most frequently used therapies were dietary supplements, vitamins and minerals recommended by a therapist (used by 66.7 %) followed by self-prescribed dietary supplements, vitamins and minerals (59.0 %), homeopathy (54.0 %), acupuncture (48.8 %) and special diets (47.5 %). Use of CAM was similar for participants reporting normal to good health compared to participants reporting poor health. For all but two CAM modalities, the self-reported treatment effect was better in the group reporting normal to good health compared to the group reporting poor health. Conclusions. CAM was widely used by participants in our study, a finding similar to findings from studies of MUPS patients. To date, health problems associated with the use of dental amalgam is not an accepted diagnosis in the healthcare system. Consequently, people suffering from such complaints experience a lack of adequate treatment and support within conventional health care, which might have contributed to the high number of CAM users in this study.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BY 4.0eng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.titleUse of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with health complaints attributed to former dental amalgam fillings.eng
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.typePeer reviewedeng
dc.rights.holderCopyright Kristoffersen et al. 2016eng
dc.date.updated2016-01-25T12:15:21Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-0996-1
dc.identifier.cristin1321654
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY 4.0
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY 4.0