Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLooman, Willemijn
dc.contributor.authorStruckmann, Verena
dc.contributor.authorKoppen, Julia
dc.contributor.authorBaltaxe, Erik
dc.contributor.authorCzypionka, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorHuic, Mirjana
dc.contributor.authorPitter, Janos
dc.contributor.authorRuths, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorStokes, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorBal, Roland
dc.contributor.authorRutten-van Molken, maureen
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T09:26:33Z
dc.date.available2021-05-20T09:26:33Z
dc.date.created2021-05-15T15:54:57Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0277-9536
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2755814
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying implementation strategies for integrated care. As part of the SELFIE project, 17 integrated care programmes addressing multi-morbidity from eight European countries were selected and studied. Data was extracted from ‘thick descriptions’ of the 17 programmes and analysed both inductively and deductively using implementation theory. The following ten mechanisms for successful implementation of integrated care were identified. With regards to service delivery, successful implementers (1) commonly adopted an incremental growth model rather than a disruptive innovation approach, and found (2) a balance between flexibility and formal structures of integration. For leadership & governance, they (3) applied collaborative governance by engaging all stakeholders, and (4) distributed leadership throughout all levels of the system. For the workforce, these implementers (5) were able to build a multidisciplinary team culture with mutual recognition of each other’s roles, and (6) stimulated the development of new roles and competencies for integrated care. With respect to financing, (7) secured long-term funding and innovative payments were applied as means to overcome fragmented financing of health and social care. Implementers emphasised (8) the implementation of ICT that was specifically developed to support collaboration and communication rather than administrative procedures (technology & medical devices), and (9) created feedback loops and a continuous monitoring system (information & research). The overarching mechanism was that implementers (10) engaged in alignment work across the different components and levels of the health and social care system. These evidence-based mechanisms for implementation are applicable in different local, regional and national contexts.
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDrivers of successful implementation of integrated care for multi-morbidity: Mechanisms identified in 17 case studies from 8 European countriesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021, Authors
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113728
dc.identifier.cristin1910172
dc.source.journalSocial Science and Medicineen_US
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/634288


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal